Posts Tagged technology
This post is probably geared mostly toward residents and academics who have access to a university library for their researchin’ and journal readin’ (and especially nerdy residents and academics). I’ve made a little tool to hopefully help a few people find accessing journal articles from home a little easier. It’s called a bookmarklet.
What does it do? Well, if your university or hospital library has a proxy server (now we’re getting reallly nerdy), you can use it to try to auto-access journal articles on the web, without the hassle of going to your library’s website, logging in, finding the journal you want, then the article you want, then opening the PDF. It’s probably easier explained in the accompanying video, below.
[vimeo width=”620″ height=”465″]http://vimeo.com/9811158[/vimeo]
After Apple announced the iPad device, I immediately began to think of all the medical applications that could be used for this device.
Currently the app store has about 140,000 apps and is growing at an amazing rate. The medical app store has about 1,920. Health apps number about 3,100. According to Apple, most of these apps should work on the iPhone and will transfer to the iPad as long as you use the same login. It will be interesting to see what the apps that were created initially for the iPhone will look like on the new iPad device. It is interesting also to note that the device does not have a camera, however the iPod Nano does. My guess is the device would take up more bandwidth if it had a camera.
I am curious to see if the iPad will work with apps like Skype and Google Voice. If they do, then with a $20, 3g plan, you could use the device as a 2nd phone. For example Google Voice allows you to set up a local phone number that others can use to call you. If you do not answer then you will get a transcribed text with the first couple of lines of the missed callers message!
What medical applications can we expect from this device?
Patient education company Blausen makes an amazing product that has short video animations on multiple medical diseases. They are very basic and range from half a minute to two minutes. Electronic medical records would be interesting. You have to wonder how they would work in the ER. I cannot imagine keeping up with an expensive device in the ER. At least one I can’t put in my pocket. I can see myself losing it during a code or dropping it as I run to the floor for a “code blue.”
I am interested in hearing from our readers and seeing how other ER doctors use technology at work. Currently, I use Pepid, although it is expensive, it has almost everything I need in the app.
Feel free to post if you are likely to purchase the next iPhone (new cell phone carrier to be announced in June), iPad wifi only will be out around March 27 and the iPad with wifi/3g service around late April in the United States. The rest of the world will get it after June which will be just in time for the new iPhone.
I look forward to your emails and post,
Harvey Castro MD
Picture from iPhone life magazine.
And we as emergency physicians should be its biggest advocates. What other doctors (besides, perhaps, outpatient doctors seeing a new patient for the first time) make do with as little information as we do in the Emergency Department? No one else.
Just for clarification, I’m talking about an electronic chart, maintained by doctors, not an “electronic health record” or “personalized health record” or any such nonsense filled out by the patient (think Google Health).
These are how my daydreams go:
- A patient comes in to see me. I immediately get a list of their medical problems, prescribed medications, and allergies. This list is with actual real words, not “the little blue pill,” or “the white one, I take 10 milligrams — or is it 100 — 3 times — or is it two times — a day.”
- I can see who a patient’s primary medical doctor is, and get quick access to their communication info.
- I can see when the patient last saw said doctor, or went to an Emergency Department, or was admitted to my — or any — hospital.
- I can talk to the patient, already knowing if they carry a diagnosis of heart failure, diabetes, hypertension, smoking — to help narrow my differential.
- I can see if the patient just had a work-up for problem X, perhaps changing my disposition of the patient.
- I can input orders electronically and write my chart electronically, allowing me to be more efficient and see more patients.
- And in this fantasy world, I could even arrange for a follow-up appointment for the patient!
The technology is clearly available, but no one is ready to make — or mandate — the leap. (Hopefully the new health bill will encourage this.) I can track an airplane across the country, trade stocks through my mobile phone, and see the street where I’ll be staying at my hotel in Berlin, but I have no way of accessing the information from the hospital 15 minutes away. God bless America.
A lot of the data is clearly available, but just not accessible. One such example: I find it absolutely astonishing that the DEA can send letters to physicians that they “gave patient X a prescription for 20 tabs of percocet, when she has already received 150 tabs of percocet from hospitals in your area,” yet we as physicians are not privy to this information.
I’ve been following health information technology for several years, and everyone is separately trying to solve the problem with their own electronic medical record, their own information system that doesn’t have a standard interface to talk to any other system. It’s about time we have something agreed upon, enacted, and changed.
(And I simply don’t buy the “Computers are too hard to learn or not useful” argument. 90% of primary care physicians in “Australia, Italy, the Netherlands, New Zealand, Norway, Sweden, and the United Kingdom” use electronic medical records, while only 46% of US physicians use them.)
It absolutely blows my mind how much time I can spend trying to page a private medical doctor or consultant.
- Call the private’s office.
- Try hitting 0, but this only works 30% of the time, and sometimes it’s a random button like “8” to reach the operating service.
- Speak with operating service, repeating my name, hospital, phone number, patient’s name, and date of birth three times over, slooowwwly.
- Private eventually responds, tell quick story, find out private wants to use the hospitalist or resident service.
- Call the hospitalist.
- 2-3 pages later, right in the middle of a discussion with another patient, hospitalist responds, or resident service responds, but they’re capped, or I’ve been paging the wrong number, finally sign patient out.
As Ten out of Ten suggests, please for the love of all that is good and efficient, let’s use cellphones. Why are we still carrying around 1980s drug dealer-style boxes when we already have a fancy-schmancy voice and text-capable device with us at all times anyway? (Okay fine, let’s do a big study and confirm, once and for all, that cellphones don’t do anything to medical equipment, and then do away with beepers.)
And why not use some sort of software/web solution like Google Voice to do all the work? Call one phone number, and it automatically forwards to the on-call cellphone. If the call is not answered, you leave a voicemail, and a text message is sent to the phone every 10 minutes until someone responds. That way you have the convenience of a pager (call back when you’re available) along with the direct-connection of a cellphone. And the call schedule is automatically fed into the system so it autoforwards without anyone intervening; if something gets goofed up, you just login to the website, click a button, and re-route the calls to someone else.
I applaud Google for trying to bring medicine into the 21st century with things like Google Health and Google Scholar; somebody’s gotta try. But their latest addition shows how even a huge organization full of hugely intelligent people can get something wrong in health care, because our world is simply a different beast.
Last week Google announced that it was making it easier to complete, upload, and store your own Advance Directive on Google Health. They even worked with an advance directive organization to have free advance directive forms for all the 50 states. (Warning #1 right there: things are different in all 50 states.)
They then go on to talk about how easy it is to “share your Google Health profile with your doctor, your family, or anyone you like.” And voila, epic fail.
Great, I say, that a patient can share his or her own medical information with loved ones or one’s doctor (more on electronic medical records and personal health records in another post). But these advance directives are not available in a searchable database by, say, name or date of birth. I’d argue that as Emergency Physicians, there are few people who need to know a patient’s code status more; perhaps intensivists, but the vast majority of patients going to an ICU setting who are going to need intubation are already intubated when arrive in the unit, and they’re going to stay that way. It’s a vast minority that get intubated in the ICU.
Our critically ill patients are usually so critically ill they’re not able to be speak, or they’re altered, or too somnolent to be thinking correctly, let alone be able to type and remember their login to Google Health. Or they’re technically DNR/DNI, but they have a family member that says do everything, and another that says “no, don’t,” and no one has any paperwork for anything. Or their DNR form isn’t valid, or they’re from another state, or their health care proxy isn’t available.
Or, say in a perfect world, you get a computer nerd online dweeb (say, me in 60 years) who has everything online and shareable with the world at large. Is the physician going to spend their precious time trying to login to a website to find out if the patient is DNR/DNI if they don’t know already, or is she going to try to review my medications, medical conditions, run through my differential diagnosis, assess my airway, and get oxygen, suction, and intubation supplies ready at the bedside?
We just recently had a case of a woman who was DNR/DNI for many years who was found in respiratory distress by the home health aide at 2am but who didn’t know the patient was DNR/DNI and couldn’t find any of the paperwork. So EMS intubated her. It was a frustrating situation for all of us–EMS, the ED staff, the patient’s family–but what was EMS to do? A perfect illustration of best-made plans falling through when things get stressful. (Luckily she was in flash pulmonary edema, and after a nitro drip we were able to extubate her in the ED.)
Look, I’m just about as techie and computer-friendly and live-your-life-online as anyone out there, but a lot of this stuff isn’t well thought-out, isn’t safe, and has no guarantees. So, Google–and emergency medicine and health care as a whole–we’ve got some work to do if we’re ever going to figure out the advance directive (and even more to take it online):
- Make a central clearinghouse. Is it going to be Google Health, or the US Living Will Registry, or some government entity? Who knows, but the only people who you really need to know about your code status are your family members and health care providers who may want to code you or intubate you. I’m not going to spend precious minutes searching through multiple websites (or possibly any) to figure out where you’ve stored your online code status.
- Confirm the patient’s identity. So all I need to know is your Google password, and I can upload a DNR form and forge your signature? (Because really, if you’re altered and septic, I’m not going to be able to verify your signature.) Scary.
- Guarantee that the online forms that are uploaded are legally binding or accurate. I don’t know how we do this, but we usually want an original copy to initiate an DNR/DNI order, not a copy–and certainly not an uploaded duplicate.
- Somehow confirm that the DNR order is the most recent. Sure, it’s great to have the information available online, but what if the copy is 3 years out of date and the patient changed their mind 2 years ago and is now full code, yet the only information we have available says “DNR?” That certainly seems suboptimal as well.
- Decide if we should even have advance directives. Some argue that they’re a waste of time and energy, when they real time should be spent letting your loved ones (and especially your health care proxy) know your wishes. If we’re not legally protected to follow advance directives (a dead patient isn’t going to sue us, but a grieving relative sure can), it’s sure difficult not to listen to that relative telling you to “do everything.”
I’m all about end-of-life care and palliative care and actually believe we don’t do enough of it in the emergency department (but how can we?), but I’m still not sold on the advance directive if it has little-to-no legal weight behind it, and I’m even less impressed by Google’s online attempt.